<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Buffett and Munger Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/</link>
	<description>Boardroom Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/comment-page-1/#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=8952#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>Co-CEOs is another form of shared leadership, which is increasingly necessary in organizations with complex, changing environments, technologies and competitors.  Indeed, in chaotic settings it is extraordinarily unlikely that one person will have all the answers, be able to control everything, and can sustain the old heroic idea of leadership.  It is certainly convenient to have one person &quot;in charge,&quot; and leaders who are so insecure that they have to appear to be the one and only in order to protect their egos are unlikely to make a shared role work.  In my view, leaders with truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, high-stakes and credit with a partner or team.
Allan R Cohen
Edward A Madden Distinguished Professor of Global Leadership
Babson College</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-CEOs is another form of shared leadership, which is increasingly necessary in organizations with complex, changing environments, technologies and competitors.  Indeed, in chaotic settings it is extraordinarily unlikely that one person will have all the answers, be able to control everything, and can sustain the old heroic idea of leadership.  It is certainly convenient to have one person &#8220;in charge,&#8221; and leaders who are so insecure that they have to appear to be the one and only in order to protect their egos are unlikely to make a shared role work.  In my view, leaders with truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, high-stakes and credit with a partner or team.<br />
Allan R Cohen<br />
Edward A Madden Distinguished Professor of Global Leadership<br />
Babson College</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merom klein</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>merom klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=8952#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Further to Allan&#039;s comment -- it takes less courage to defer to one person who is &quot;in charge&quot; and heave a sigh that you are &quot;just following orders&quot; than it does to step up, facilitate debate and champion your ideas to co-CEOs (or co-sponsors) who will sharpen your thinking with very different perspectives.  No one ever said that throwing off the chains of groupthink or of placating the boss would be easy.  Just as leaders who truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, those who report to them also need strong egos to live and prosper in the shadow of their dynamic tension.
Merom Klein, PhD
Director, The Courage Institute International</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to Allan&#8217;s comment &#8212; it takes less courage to defer to one person who is &#8220;in charge&#8221; and heave a sigh that you are &#8220;just following orders&#8221; than it does to step up, facilitate debate and champion your ideas to co-CEOs (or co-sponsors) who will sharpen your thinking with very different perspectives.  No one ever said that throwing off the chains of groupthink or of placating the boss would be easy.  Just as leaders who truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, those who report to them also need strong egos to live and prosper in the shadow of their dynamic tension.<br />
Merom Klein, PhD<br />
Director, The Courage Institute International</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Human Being</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Being</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=8952#comment-684</guid>
		<description>A well studied post. Considering what makes  normal people a great CEO is pertinent as co-CEO&#039;s try to endeavor a common goal with the elegance of perseverance by holding each other from slipping, joining spheres of experience and exposure showing the world what good intentions and great brains could mould together as success path laying foundations that foster relationships both internal and external, marching ahead in pride showing future generation a tint of team work, come what the position be.
Coming to think about few unified success as a resultant of well thought strategies that dominate the CEO&#039;s were combination of gathering information (Gather information about products, companies, consumers, markets, people, services, politics any thing, just anything and everything and disbursing it to right people),ability to convert information into a profit making opportunity, ability to jump from one orbit to next mastering each while on the go are just few to name.
It is indeed convincing now than ever that in such hard times that a duo relationship in the CEO position is a mandatory element than a matter of choice. As we understand that one brain can certainly have its limitations and having another brain to balance, inspire, redeem, aspire, advocate and share is imminent order for many still successfully surviving companies of this era. 
I am sure there will be many such success stories of co-CEOs to be said in years to come as we go through most memorable period in history of world economics! Wishing all the co-CEOs much greater success than what history has offered us so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well studied post. Considering what makes  normal people a great CEO is pertinent as co-CEO&#8217;s try to endeavor a common goal with the elegance of perseverance by holding each other from slipping, joining spheres of experience and exposure showing the world what good intentions and great brains could mould together as success path laying foundations that foster relationships both internal and external, marching ahead in pride showing future generation a tint of team work, come what the position be.<br />
Coming to think about few unified success as a resultant of well thought strategies that dominate the CEO&#8217;s were combination of gathering information (Gather information about products, companies, consumers, markets, people, services, politics any thing, just anything and everything and disbursing it to right people),ability to convert information into a profit making opportunity, ability to jump from one orbit to next mastering each while on the go are just few to name.<br />
It is indeed convincing now than ever that in such hard times that a duo relationship in the CEO position is a mandatory element than a matter of choice. As we understand that one brain can certainly have its limitations and having another brain to balance, inspire, redeem, aspire, advocate and share is imminent order for many still successfully surviving companies of this era.<br />
I am sure there will be many such success stories of co-CEOs to be said in years to come as we go through most memorable period in history of world economics! Wishing all the co-CEOs much greater success than what history has offered us so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/dynamic-duos/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=8952#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Co-CEOs is another form of shared leadership, which is increasingly necessary in organizations with complex, changing environments, technologies and competitors.  Indeed, in chaotic settings it is extraordinarily unlikely that one person will have all the answers, be able to control everything, and can sustain the old heroic idea of leadership.  It is certainly convenient to have one person &quot;in charge,&quot; and leaders who are so insecure that they have to appear to be the one and only in order to protect their egos are unlikely to make a shared role work.  In my view, leaders with truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, high-stakes and credit with a partner or team.
Allan R Cohen
Edward A Madden Distinguished Professor of Global Leadership
Babson College</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-CEOs is another form of shared leadership, which is increasingly necessary in organizations with complex, changing environments, technologies and competitors.  Indeed, in chaotic settings it is extraordinarily unlikely that one person will have all the answers, be able to control everything, and can sustain the old heroic idea of leadership.  It is certainly convenient to have one person &#8220;in charge,&#8221; and leaders who are so insecure that they have to appear to be the one and only in order to protect their egos are unlikely to make a shared role work.  In my view, leaders with truly large egos are strong enough to share decision-making, high-stakes and credit with a partner or team.<br />
Allan R Cohen<br />
Edward A Madden Distinguished Professor of Global Leadership<br />
Babson College</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

