Skip navigation
Email this story to a friendAdd CommentSubscribeOrder Back IssuesSponsor: Pearl Meyer & Partners

The Directorship Boardroom & Economic Forum

To register for the annual global gathering of leading board directors and corporate governance influentials click here.

DOWNLOAD BROCHURE

September 01, 2007

M&A

How much dry powder are buyout firms sitting on?

How can you tell if your company is a private-equity target? With the record volume and total value of deals announced by private-equity firms so far this year, and the diversity of transaction types and sizes, your board may have to come to terms with this distinct  possibility.

 

One way to gauge the odds of being acquired by private equity is to consider the enormous amounts of capital private-equity firms have raised over the first half of this year versus the cumulative amount of announced deals. Based on the remaining uncommitted cash, it strongly suggests that, barring a change in the economy, deal-making will continue at a rapid pace over the next six months to a year.

 

“The fund-raising machine is running full steam ahead, so there is no reason to think that the deal-making machine will slow down any time soon,” says Bob Keiser, vice president of proprietary research at Thomson Financial.

 

Making an educated guess at just how much dry powder—or overhang as it is sometimes called—private equity firms have stashed in their coffers is not easy. Earlier this year, a source at the Blackstone Group estimated that the funds available to be invested by global buyout firms were in the range of $400 billion, according to an article in Fortune magazine. Private Equity Intelligence, a London-based research firm, says the amount is roughly $300 billion to $350 billion for global buyout firms. These figures may underestimate the true number: Another private-equity expert, who wishes to remain anonymous, says that the figure, which is calculated by subtracting announced fundings from what has been raised, is closer to $700 billion, including all types of private equity. The exact number can be hard to pin down because private-equity firms are unregulated and under no obligation to report their figures. “What’s been raised and what has been committed are fairly soft numbers,” says Greg Peterson, a partner in the Transactions Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Buyout firms don’t always announce follow-on investments, or they are coy about exactly how much they have raised, he says.

 

There are no doubts, however, about the fact that records are being set in private-equity fund-raising. According to Private Equity Intelligence, private-equity firms raised $260 billion in new investment funds worldwide during the first half of 2007. Of that, 67 leveraged buyout funds raised more than $116 billion. Thomson estimates fundraising by buyout firms during 2006 to be a record $188 billion. Many firms ultimately took in more than they initially set out to raise. Goldman Sachs, for example, closed a $20 billion fund in April that was originally planned for $10 billion. Blackstone also amassed a $20 billion fund, well over its initial target. “They are raising more money, deploying it quicker, and then going back for more,” says Peterson. “They are also exiting their investments quicker and with positive returns.”

 

Of course, the amount of capital that private-equity firms raise is just a fraction of their buying capacity due to leverage. Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard University, says that deals being done today typically use about 70 percent debt. Using that multiplier and the conservative $400 billion figure from Blackstone, the collective buying power of private-equity firms could be as high as $1.3 trillion dollars.  “It’s hard to net out dollar for dollar and figure out the cash on hand,” says Lerner. “But no doubt it is at an all-time high.” Whether or not they will find ways to employ it all—or if the bond market will hold up long enough for them to use it—is quite another story.

Tags: proxy season (6)
Email this story to a friendAdd CommentSubscribeOrder Back IssuesSponsor: Pearl Meyer & Partners

Comments:

 Fred Larsen said:
Looked at in aggregate, the capital private equity companies have raised is truly staggering. However, the numbers reveal themselves in a different light once one realizes that most private equity firms simply will not consider making investments if they cannot source substantial additional capital, in the form of leveraged finance. Whether the percentage of the total consideration paid for a company in a leveraged buyout is 70% debt, 60%, or even 50%, the real driver of whether or not a deal gets consummated is whether the PE firm is able to source enough debt on attractive enough terms to make their expected returns possible. With the current (August/September 2007) disruptions in the credit markets, we have seen a substantial retreat from risk on the part of potential lenders to LBOs. Simply put, less debt is available on less attractive terms for LBOs than even three months ago. LBOs of $50 billion or more, which were considered not out of the realm of possibility earlier this year, are strictly off the table for the time being. Private equity firms are still interested in buying companies, and do still have substantial equity capital dry powder to do so. In fact, when one understands their business model, one realizes that they have every incentive to invest capital committed to them by their limited partners as soon as possible, rather than return it. Because available leveraged finance is lower now, however, this means PE firms will only buy companies if they can get them at lower prices or valuation multiples than in the recent past. But sellers--whether they are private companies or public corporations--must be willing to sell at lower multiples, which many are loathe to do so soon after the frenzied dealmaking environment of 2006 and 2007. For the time being, sellers remain firmly in the driver's seat for M&A, and private equity's recent cost of capital-driven pricing advantage versus corporate acquirors has disappeared.
September 27, 2007 2:05 PM
 Fred Larsen said:
Looked at in aggregate, the capital private equity companies have raised is truly staggering. However, the numbers reveal themselves in a different light once one realizes that most private equity firms simply will not consider making investments if they cannot source substantial additional capital, in the form of leveraged finance. Whether the percentage of the total consideration paid for a company in a leveraged buyout is 70% debt, 60%, or even 50%, the real driver of whether or not a deal gets consummated is whether the PE firm is able to source enough debt on attractive enough terms to make their expected returns possible. With the current (August/September 2007) disruptions in the credit markets, we have seen a substantial retreat from risk on the part of potential lenders to LBOs. Simply put, less debt is available on less attractive terms for LBOs than even three months ago. LBOs of $50 billion or more, which were considered not out of the realm of possibility earlier this year, are strictly off the table for the time being. Private equity firms are still interested in buying companies, and do still have substantial equity capital dry powder to do so. In fact, when one understands their business model, one realizes that they have every incentive to invest capital committed to them by their limited partners as soon as possible, rather than return it. Because available leveraged finance is lower now, however, this means PE firms will only buy companies if they can get them at lower prices or valuation multiples than in the recent past. But sellers--whether they are private companies or public corporations--must be willing to sell at lower multiples, which many are loathe to do so soon after the frenzied dealmaking environment of 2006 and 2007. For the time being, sellers remain firmly in the driver's seat for M&A, and private equity's recent cost of capital-driven pricing advantage versus corporate acquirors has disappeared.
September 27, 2007 2:06 PM