<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Directorship &#124; Boardroom Intelligence &#187; performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directorship.com/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directorship.com</link>
	<description>Boardroom Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Growth, Risk, Financial Communications, Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/mary-pat-mcarthy-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directorship.com/mary-pat-mcarthy-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Pat McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=16412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies face an array of risks and uncertainties in 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although we&#8217;re seeing signs of economic growth, it&#8217;s clear that a difficult, tenuous recovery lies ahead. From a “growthless” economy, to public-policy initiatives impacting a broad cross-section of companies and industries, to trillion-dollar government deficits, sovereign risk, and the complexities of global business, companies face an array of risks and uncertainties in 2010.</p>
<p>Given the pressures on management, internal controls, and financial-reporting systems in this environment, the audit committee’s role—and its effectiveness—will be pivotal. We recently spent two days talking with 120 audit committee members from around the United States—across industries, large- and mid-cap—about their top concerns and priorities, and what they see as keys to audit committee effectiveness going forward.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the three areas cited by conference attendees as the “top concerns” for 2010 are the uncertainties of the economic/legislative environments, risk management/oversight and financial communications.</p>
<p>Risk, uncertainty and the audit committee’s role. The search for top-line growth is a critical priority for companies today, and boards are mobilizing management to rethink the company’s strategy, stress-test the business model and address—head-on—the challenges of a low-growth environment. Audit committees are helping to “ignite” the conversation about where the risks are in this environment—whether it’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act risk associated with the search for growth in emerging markets, or focusing internal audit on the risks associated with the company’s new strategic initiatives.</p>
<p>Audit committees are also rethinking their risk oversight role. While more and more boards are assuming oversight responsibility for strategic risks, some boards still see an expansive role for the audit committee, encompassing oversight of the company’s risk-management processes as well as key substantive areas of risk.</p>
<p>Others take a much more restrictive view, as one panelist noted: “The audit committee exists to deal with one very significant enterprise-wide risk, and that’s the risk of either fraudulent or erroneous financial reporting. That’s plenty.”</p>
<p>Deeper involvement in all financial communications. Audit committees are intensifying their focus on all financial communications—from earnings guidance and earnings press releases to the MD&amp;A and other disclosures. Some companies have taken the financial crisis as an opportunity to either discontinue earnings guidance, or reconsider the types and frequency of guidance they provide.</p>
<p>Our discussions also pointed to the earnings press release as perhaps the most important communication to investors today: “It’s where the action is,” said one director. But earnings releases often pose more issues than 10-Qs, as they contain important business information that often does not come from the financial reporting system, is not audited, and is not subject to internal controls.</p>
<p>The dialogue also highlighted key disclosure areas the Securities and Exchange Commission will be focusing on in 2010, including new disclosures companies must make about how they address risk, compensation, leadership and other aspects of corporate governance.</p>
<p>And, of course, audit committees will need to stay focused on a number of key financial reporting issues that became particularly acute during the financial crisis, including fair value, goodwill and intangible impairments, pension assets and obligations, and tax valuation allowances.</p>
<p>Gauging the audit committee’s effectiveness. Given the challenges ahead, conference attendees emphasized the need for audit committees to take a close look at their effectiveness, to ensure the committee is focused on the right issues and is in a position to help lead the business forward. To this end, panelists highlighted a number of questions for audit committees to consider as they monitor their performance:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do we have the right people on the committee—directors who understand the business and are willing and able to ask the right questions?</li>
<li>Is each member of the committee capable of understanding the financial reporting issues and complexities arising from the company’s business activities?</li>
<li>Do we take an active role in determining the committee’s agenda and defining its information requirements?</li>
<li>Do we insist on transparency—both internal transparency (between management and the audit committee) and external transparency?</li>
<li>Do we speak our mind? Do we listen? Do we build consensus?</li>
<li>Do we take a hard look at our committee’s performance, and assess the performance of individual committee members?</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Mary Pat McCarthy is U.S. vice chair, KPMG, and executive director of KPMG’s Audit Committee Institute.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directorship.com/mary-pat-mcarthy-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wachtell Lipton Highlights Emerging Board Concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/wachtell-lipton-2010-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directorship.com/wachtell-lipton-2010-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO Succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate goverance guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duties of the board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lipton Wachtell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marty Lipton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation of Chairman and CEO positions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short-Term Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Some Thoughts for Boards of Directors in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=13161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marty Lipton's: "Some Thoughts for Boards of Directors in 2010"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the ongoing seismic shift in the corporate governance landscape, directors find they must refocus and renew the proper role and functions of their boards. That’s the central theme of “Some Thoughts for Boards of Directors in 2010,” by Martin Lipton, Steven A. Rosenblum and Karessa L. Cain, authors of Wachtell Lipton Rosen &amp; Katz law firm&#8217;s annual outlook for corporate governance guidance. The 32-page report, while allowing that there is clearly no-one-size-fits-all approach to crafting a successful board, offers recommendations for key areas of concentration including CEO Succession Planning, Long-Term Strategy and Monitoring Performance and Compliance. “Some are perennial themes that remain relevant and deserve to be re-emphasized from year to year, whereas others have recently come into particular focus,” the authors say.</p>
<p><strong><a href="../media/2009/12/Some-Thoughts-for-Boards-of-Directors-in-2010-1.pdf">CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL REPORT</a></strong><em><strong><br />
</strong></em></p>
<p><img src="file:///Users/MaryHelen/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directorship.com/wachtell-lipton-2010-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery Communications Extends CEO Zaslav&#8217;s Contract</title>
		<link>http://www.directorship.com/discovery-communications-zaslavs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directorship.com/discovery-communications-zaslavs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boardroom News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors Daily Briefing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Zaslav]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hendricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directorship.com/?p=10231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zaslav's contract was extended two years before its original termination date because the board, happy with Zaslav's performance, wanted to lock him up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span lang="EN-GB">Discovery Communications&#8217; chief executive and president, David Zaslav, will stay in his job until 2015 and receive a significant hike  in compensation under a contract extension signed this week, the company&#8217;s board of directors have said. Zaslav&#8217;s contract was extended two years before its original termination date because the board, happy with Zaslav&#8217;s performance, wanted to lock him up, reports the <em><strong><a title="Click here for the full story" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/10/AR2009091004059.html?hpid=sec-business" target="_blank">Washington Post</a></strong></em>. &#8220;By any measure or metric, Discovery Communications has had a terrific performance, and securing David&#8217;s leadership gives me great confidence  the best is yet to come,&#8221; Discovery founder John Hendricks said in a statement. Zaslav came from NBC Universal&#8217;s cable division to take over the Silver Spring cable television company in 2006. His base salary will rise from $2 million to $3 million per year and he will receive additional compensation tied to Discovery&#8217;s ratings and revenue performance, the company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The value of his performance-based compensation can go up to $4 million initially and then rise by an additional $500,000 each year through 2014, the documents say. Guaranteed bonuses have been eliminated.  When Zaslav took over Discovery, it was privately held by Advance/Newhouse Communications and Discovery Holding, run by Liberty Media Chairman John C. Malone. Advance, Malone and Cox Communications were longtime stakeholders in Discovery, founded in 1985 by Hendricks.  Under Zaslav, Discovery bought out Cox&#8217;s stake in 2007, beginning the process of streamlining ownership. Advance and Malone combined their stakes in the company to take it public about a year ago. Malone and Advance each holds a seat on Discovery&#8217;s board. Shares of Discovery closed up 4.6 percent at $28.42 Thursday, and have doubled in price for year, beating the Nasdaq composite index by more than 60 percentage points.<strong> </strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directorship.com/discovery-communications-zaslavs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

